The other weakest remaining conference, with many members that are geographically close to existing Big Ten schools, this time let's look at the Big East.
Connecticut
Pros: A very good basketball team, and a football team that is coming up. Located close to a large media market (New York), and also being the number one public school in New England could mean new viewing areas for the Big Ten.
Cons: Doesn't necessarily have that big of a grip on the New York market. Also not a member of the AAU. Doesn't have a very big football stadium, but it could be expanded.
Pittsburgh
Pros: Already within the Big Ten geographic footprint, and adds a nice counterpoint to PSU. Has good football and basketball, although isn't quite nationally prominent in those yet.
Cons: Already within the Big Ten geographic footprint, and doesn't add new viewers. Hasn't quite hit the big time in revenue sports.
Rutgers
Pros: In a large state that is close to major television markets. Academically solid.
Cons: Culturally different than other Big Ten schools. Doesn't have very good sports. Also might not do much for viewership or prominence, because Philadelphia and New York are pro towns. Rutgers also isn't the biggest name school in the area.
Syracuse
Pros: Expands the Big Ten into a new big state. Academically respectable. Has one of the best basketball programs in the country, and often plays in New York City.
Cons: Again, not the biggest academic enterprise in the state. Awful football, and doesn't necessarily have that much of a draw in New York City.
While some of these schools might be a smart idea, the Big Ten needs to be careful which ones it chooses, and which will be the best all-around fit.
No comments:
Post a Comment